ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with different metastatic sites.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed among 830 ES-SCLC patients who were admitted to our hospital from 2010 to 2019. They all received the first-line chemotherapy and had no progression after chemotherapy. 341 patients of them received thoracic radiotherapy after chemotherapy. The main endpoint was overall survival. The Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical data including gender and age, etc. Univariate survival analysis was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves between two groups. A multivariate prognostic analysis was made by the Cox proportional hazard model.Results:In all the patients, the overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months. The patients with thoracic radiotherapy had significantly higher OS than the patients without thoracic radiotherapy (15.2 months vs.10.8 months, P<0.001). Thoracic radiotherapy significantly improved the OS in patients without liver metastasis (16.0 months vs.11.4 months, P<0.001) in the oligometastatic patients. But for the oligometastatic patients with liver metastasis, the OS benefit was not significant (14.2 months vs. 10.6 months, P=0.072). For polymetastatic patients without liver metastasis, thoracic radiotherapy offered significant OS benefits (14.5 months vs.10.9 months, P<0.001), but for the polymetastatic patients with liver metastasis, the OS was not improved with thoracic radiotherapy (10.2 months vs.9.2 months, P=0.715). Conclusions:In ES-SCLC patients, thoracic radiotherapy provides significant OS benefits in patients with oligometastases ES-SCLC without liver metastasis and for the liver metastatic patients may also benefit from thoracic radiotherapy based on the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In patients with multiple metastases, thoracic radiotherapy only improves the OS in patients without liver metastasis, but does not improve the prognosis in patients with liver metastasis.
ABSTRACT
Thoracic radiotherapy is a major treatment and dose fractionation remains controversial in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy, as a standard protocol established in prospective studies, is often replaced by other treatment strategies in clinical practice due to the occurrence of side effects and inconvenience. In addition, in inoperable stage Ⅰ small cell lung cancer with negative lymph nodes, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) provides a new option for some elderly patients who are expected to be unable to tolerate long-term radiotherapy. The appropriate dose fractionation scheme can both ensure the therapeutic effects and reduce toxic effects. This article reviews the research of limited-stage small cell lung cancer about dose fractionation.
ABSTRACT
Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) is one of the rate-limiting enzymes that degrade tryptophan (Trp) into kynurenine (Kyn). Inflammatory factor IFN-γ mediates tumor′s immune escape by activating the IDO signaling pathway, upregulating theKyn/Trp (K/T ratio) and suppressing the activity of both CD 8+T and regulatory T cells. Radiotherapy plays a major role in treating non-small cell lung cancer. It not only bi-directionally regulates immune response of the host, but also collaborates with immunosuppressive agents to kill tumors. Meanwhile, immune status of the host can affect the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy. In recent years, studies have shown that IDO activity levels change before and after radiotherapy and is related to clinical prognosis. Nevertheless, relevant mechanism remains unclear. This article aims to elucidate the application of IDO signaling pathway in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the association between the timing of brain metastases and the prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 131 patients with limited-stage SCLC firstly metastasized to the brain were admitted to our hospital from 2007 to 2015.According to the median bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS),all patients were divided into A group (BMFS ≤ 10 months,n =61) and B group (BMFS＞ 10 months,n=70).The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Between-group comparison was performed by log-rank test.The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.Results In all 131 patients,the median overall survival (OS) and 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates were 22.5 months,87.3％,44.7％,and 20.8％,respectively.The median OS after brain metastases and 1-and 2-year OS rates were 9.3 months,39.3％ and 14.8％,respectively.No statistical significance was observed in the median OS after brain metastases between the A and B groups (8.6 vs.9.3 months,P=0.695).Moreover,the OS after brain metastases did not significantly differ in patients without PCI or those receiving different therapies after brain metastases between two groups (P=0.240-0.731).Conclusions The timing of SCLC with brain metastases is significantly correlated with the OS rather than the OS after brain metastases.Therefore,prevention of brain metastases may be an effective approach to prolong the OS of patients with SCLC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on the prognosis of elderly patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).Methods Clinical data of 83 patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with metastatic ES-SCLC admitted to our hospital from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.All enrolled patients received etoposide plus cisplatin or carboplatin as the standard regimen for chemotherapy.After the propensity score matching (PSM),70 cases were either assigned into the TRT (n=35) or non-TRT groups (n=35).Among them,56 patients were male and 14 female.The median age was 69 years (range:65-85 years).The median chemotherapy cycle was 4 cycles (range:1-11 cycles).The median chest irradiation dose was 50 Gy (range:30-60 Gy).Overall survival (OS),progression-free survival (PFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were regarded as end-point of observation.The survival rate was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method and statistically compared between two groups by using Log-rank test.Multivariate prognostic analysis was performed using Cox regression model.Results For all patients,the 1-year OS,PFS and LRFS rates were 40％,16％ and 21％,respectively.Patients undergoing TRT obtained better survival outcomes than their counterparts without TRT:the 1-year OS,PFS and LRFS were 52％ vs.29％(P=0.005),30％ vs.3％(P＜0.001),38％ vs.6％ (P＜0.001),respectively.Furthermore,TRT did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions in elderly patients (P=0.690).Conclusion The addition of TRT for elder ES-SCLC patients can significantly improve the rate of chest tumor control and prolong the survival time,which is worthy of further validation by prospective studies with large sample size.
ABSTRACT
Radiotherapy is the common traditional treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).In recent years,remarkable advances have been made in immunotherapy,especially the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.How to effectively combine radiotherapy and immunotherapy to maximize the benefit for patients has become a hot topic in clinical research.This article expounds recent research progress in immunotherapy for NSCLC,the effect of radiotherapy on tumor immunology,and the advances and challenges in radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
Currently,lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world.The local control (LC) rate is only 20％-40％ for patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Hence,reducing the LC rate and enhancing the overall survival (OS) are pivotal research objectives.However,postoperative adjuvant treatment for patients with early NSCLC with chest wall invasion is still controversial.In this article,the research progress on T3 N0-1M0 NSCLC with chest wall invasion was reviewed from the perspectives including anatomical features,types of resection,patterns of failure and postoperative radiotherapy,etc.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and surgery in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods A total of 227 patients who were initially diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC and with complete clinical data admitted to Henan Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and December 2016 were recruited and assigned into the SABR (n=73) and surgery groups (n=154).Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and survival comparison was performed using the log-rank test.Chi-square test was adopted to compare the baseline data between two groups.Results All patients completed corresponding treatment.The samples of SABR group and operation group were 74 and 155 cases respectively.The 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 97.2％,81.9％ and 96.5％,78.2％ (P=0.603),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 90.1％,66.9％ and 89.2％,66.9％ (P=0.565),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year locoregional recurrence free survival rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 92.8％,84.0％ and 96.5％,90.8％ (P=0.133),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 97.2％,75.4％ and 89.2％,69.8％ (P=0.095),respectively.Conclusions SABR and surgery yield similar OS,PFS,locoregional recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival rates in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.Therefore,SABR is an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
treatment of LS-SCLC, two fractionation modes show similar short-term efficacy and survival benefits. However, hyperfractionated radiotherapy causes a higher incidence of radiation esophagitis than conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Given that hyperfractionated radiotherapy is not superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy,conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.
ABSTRACT
Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) is most popular in targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) . In recent years, there have been a great number of molecular biology studies of EGFR. Radiotherapy is well-known as a traditional and important treatment for NSCLC, and the treatment outcome is associated with EGFR mutation and overexpression. Phase Ⅲ trials are needed to evaluate the effect of a combination of radiotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ( EGFR-TKI) in the treatment of NSCLC. MicroRNAs ( miRNAs) can modulate tumor-associated gene expression and influence the biological process of tumor. Recent studies have demonstrated that miRNAs play a positive or negative role in EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKI treatment, and radiotherapy, which mechanism has been partially clarified. In this article, we review the research advances in the association of miRNAs with EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKI, and radiotherapy, so as to provide the latest evidence for the application of miRNAs in the combination of radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI for the treatment of NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the consensus and controversies on the delineation of radiotherapy target volume for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).Methods Questionnaires including 15 questions on the delineation of radiotherapy target volume of NSCLC were sent to 12 radiation departments in China in November 2015.A patient with LA-NSCLC was selected by Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and simulation CT images and medical history data were sent to the 12 radiation departments.Twelve radiation oncologists from the 12 radiation departments showed and explained the delineation of radiotherapy target volume of their own, and the patient was discussed by all experts in the sixth multidisciplinary summit forum of precise radiotherapy and chemotherapy for tumor and lung cancer.Results All receivers of the questionnaire answered the questions.The standard lung window width/level for the delineation of lung cancer was 800-1600/-600 to-750 HU, and the mediastinum window was 350-400/20-40 HU.Respiratory movement was measured by stimulator, 4D-CT, and stimulator+4D-CT with 2-5 mm expansion based on experience.The primary clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as gross target volume (GTV) plus 5-6 mm for squamous carcinoma/5-8 mm for adenocarcinoma.The metastatic lesion of mediastinal lymph nodes was delineated as 5 mm plus primary lesion in 6 departments and as primary lesion in another 6 departments.Of the 12 departments, 10 applied 5 mm of set-up error, 1 applied 3 mm, and 1 applied 4-6 mm.For V20 of the lungs, 10 departments defined it as<30%, 1 as<35%, and 1 as 28%.Nine departments defined the radiation dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for LA-NSCLC as 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 62.7 Gy in 33 fractions in 1 department, 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions in 1 department, and 60-70 Gy in 25-30 fractions in 1 department.For the delineation of target volume for the LA-NSCLC patient treated with CCRT, the primary planning target volume (PTV) was defined as GTV plus organ movement (IGTV) and set-up error (GTV→IGTV→PTV) in 3 departments, as CTV plus organ movement (ITV) and set-up error (GTV→CTV→ITV→PTV) in 8 departments, and as CTV plus set-up error/IGTV plus 5-6 mm for squamous carcinoma/5-8 mm for adenocarcinoma (CTV) and set-up error (GTV→CTV→PTV/GTV→IGTV→CTV→PTV) in 1 department.For the delineation of PTV in the mediastinal lymph node, GTV→IGTV→PTV was performed in 3 departments, GTV→CTV→ITV→PTV in 8 departments, and GTV→CTV→PTV in 1 department.For 10%-100% patients with LA-NSCLC, the radiation field needed to be replanned when 38-50 Gy was completed.There was no unified standard for the optimal standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) simulation and delineation.Seven departments had applied magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation and 10 departments had applied stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.For the delineation of PTV for early-stage NSCLC (T1-2N0M0), GTV→IGTV→PTV was performed in 5 departments, IGTV→PTV in 3 departments, and GTV→CTV→ITV→PTV in 2 departments.In all the 12 departments, peripheral early-stage NSCLC was given 6.0-12.5 Gy/fraction, 3-12 fractions and central early-stage NSCLC was given 4.6-10.0 Gy/fraction, 5-10 fractions.The results of discussion on the delineation of target volume for the patient were as follows:respiratory movements should be measured by 4D-CT or simulator;the lung window width/level is 1600/-600 HU and the mediastinal window width/level is 400/20 HU;the primary controversy is whether the involved-field irradiation or elective nodal irradiation should be used for the delineation of CTVnd in the mediastinal lymph node.Conclusions Basic consensus is reached for the delineation of target volume in LANSCLC in these aspects:lung window width/level, respiratory movements and set-up error, primary lesion delineation, the radiation dose in CCRT, and the optimal time for replanning the radiation field.There are controversies on the optimal SUV in the delineation of target volume based on PET-CT simulation, the optimal dose fractionation in SBRT for early-stage NSCLC, and the delineation of CTVnd.
ABSTRACT
Stage Ⅲ A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has high heterogeneity and there are some controversies over the treatment of this disease,especially for patients with stage ⅢA-N2 NSCLC.This article investigates whether preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy can improve the survival of patients with stage ⅢA-N2 NSCLC and evaluates the effect of surgical treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of different metastatic sites on the prognosis of extensive?stage small cell lung cancer ( SCLC ) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed among 322 patients pathologically or cytologically diagnosed with extensive?stage SCLC ( stage ⅠV defined by the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2015. In those patients, 246 had primary lesions with distant metastasis and 76 primary lesions with non?regional lymph node metastasis;261 had single?organ metastasis and 61 multi?organ metastases. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan?Meier method. Between?group comparison of the survival was made by the log?rank test. A multivariate prognostic analysis was made by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results In all the patients, the median survival time ( MST) was 11. 7 months;1?and 2?year overall survival ( OS) rates were 47. 9% and 19. 5%, respectively. The patients with single?organ metastasis had significantly longer MST and significantly higher 1?and 2?year OS rates than the patients with multi?organ metastases ( 12. 4 vs. 8. 9 months;52. 5% vs. 30. 5%;21. 9% vs. 11. 2%;P=0. 014) . In the patients with single?organ metastasis, those with liver metastasis had the worst prognosis with a MST of 8. 5 months, while those with non?regional lymph node metastasis had the best prognosis with a MST of 14. 5 months ( P= 0. 001 );there was no significant difference in the prognosis between patients with metastasis to different organs other than the liver ( P=0. 139) . In the patients with multi?organ metastases, those with liver metastasis and bone metastasis had the worst prognosis ( P=0. 016,0. 006);there was no significant relationship between brain metastasis and the prognosis of extensive?stage SCLC with multi?organ metastases ( P=0. 995) . There was no significantdifference in the prognosis between those with liver metastasis only and multi?organ metastases ( P=0. 862) . Conclusions Liver metastasis predicts the worst prognosis in patients initially diagnosed with extensive?stage SCLC and single?organ metastasis. Liver metastasis and bone metastasis predict the worst prognosis in patients with multi?organ metastases. Brain metastasis has no significant effect on the prognosis. There is no significant difference in the prognosis of extensive?stage SCLC between patients with single?and multi?organ metastases once liver metastasis occurs.
ABSTRACT
Small cell lung cancer ( SCLC ) is one common type of lung cancer in China. No remarkable progress has been made in systemic therapy for SCLC since the 90’ s. However, there are some advances in radiotherapy ( RT) for SCLC, which make it possible to improve treatment outcomes of SCLC. Those advances are mainly made in thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation for extensive?stage SCLC, radiation dose and technology of thoracic RT for limited?stage SCLC, and significance of prophylactic cranial irradiation for early?stage SCLC. The paper reviews the research advances in the East and West to provide some help and references for readers.
ABSTRACT
Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) is most popular in targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) . In recent years, there have been a great number of molecular biology studies of EGFR. Radiotherapy is well-known as a traditional and important treatment for NSCLC, and the treatment outcome is associated with EGFR mutation and overexpression. Phase Ⅲ trials are needed to evaluate the effect of a combination of radiotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ( EGFR-TKI) in the treatment of NSCLC. MicroRNAs ( miRNAs) can modulate tumor-associated gene expression and influence the biological process of tumor. Recent studies have demonstrated that miRNAs play a positive or negative role in EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKI treatment, and radiotherapy, which mechanism has been partially clarified. In this article, we review the research advances in the association of miRNAs with EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKI, and radiotherapy, so as to provide the latest evidence for the application of miRNAs in the combination of radiotherapy and EGFR-TKI for the treatment of NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of different chemoradiotherapy ( CRT) schemes on the prognosis of extensive?stage small?cell lung cancer ( SCLC ) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 322 patients with extensive?stage SCLC who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2015.All patients received standard EP/CE ( etoposide+cisplatin/carboplatin) chemotherapy. According to RECIST criteria, the efficacy of chemotherapy was divided into complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease ( PD). A total of 232 patients without PD after chemotherapy were enrolled as subjects and divided into radiotherapy group (n=187) and non?radiotherapy group (n=45).The patients undergoing radiotherapy were further divided into early radiotherapy group ( before 3 cycles of chemotherapy, n=65) and late radiotherapy group (after 3 cycles of chemotherapy, n=122),or concurrent CRT group ( n=45 ) and sequential CRT group ( n=142 ) . The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan?Meier method. Between?group comparison was made by log?rank test. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results In all the patients, the median overall survival ( OS ) , progression?free survival (PFS),and local recurrence?free survival (LRFS) time was 13?2,8?7,and 14?6 months, respectively. The non?radiotherapy group had significantly shorter median OS, PFS, and LRFS time than the radiotherapy group ( 8?7 vs. 15?0 months, P=0?00;5?6 vs. 9?8 months, P=0?00;5?9 vs. 19?2 months, P=0?00).There were no significant differences in median OS, PFS, or LRFS time between the early radiotherapy group and the late radiotherapy group ( 15?4 vs. 14?6 months, P=0?720;8?0 vs. 10?8 months, P=0?426;19?2 vs. 18?1 months, P=0?981) . The concurrent CRT group had significantly longer median OS time than the sequential CRT group (19?4 vs. 13?8 months, P=0?036),while there were no significant differences in median PFS or LRFS time between the two groups ( 10?8 vs. 9?8 months, P=0?656;19?8 vs. 17?8 months, P= 0?768 ) . Generally, patients undergoing radiotherapy had increased incidence rates of adverse reactions than those without radiotherapy (P=0?038).However, the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse reactions were similar between the two groups ( P=0?126) . Conclusions In the treatment of extensive?stage SCLC, thoracic radiotherapy improves the treatment outcomes without increasing the incidence rates of severe adverse reactions. When to receive radiotherapy has nothing to do with the prognosis. Concurrent CRT may further improve the treatment outcomes, which still needs further studies.
ABSTRACT
Conventional CT plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, radiotherapy target delineation, and prognosis of NSCLC, but it still has many limitations.PET/CT has been widely used in the diagnosis and treamtent of lung cancer.In particular, PET/CT metabolic parameters have great guiding significance in the prognosis of NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy, and may be superior to many clinical indices.This review summarizes the advances in the application of PET/CT in the prognostic evaluation of NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the correlation of different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy with the local control ( LC) and overall survival ( OS) rates in patients with extensive?stage small cell lung cancer ( ES?SCLC ) , and to figure out the relationship between different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy and the prognosis of ES?SCLC. Methods One hundred and ten patients newly diagnosed with ES?SCLC from February 2010 to March 2015 received chemoradiotherapy. According to the radiation dose, all patients were divided into hypo?fractionation group ( 30?45 Gy/3 Gy/10?15 f, n=31) and conventional fractionation group ( 54?60 Gy/1?8?2?0 Gy/27?30 f, n=79) . In all patients, 90?9% had stageⅣSCLC;21 patients had brain metastasis;39 patients were treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation ( PCI ) . The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate the survival time and log?rank test was used for between?group comparison. Between?group comparison of categorical data was made by χ2 test. Results The number of patients followed?up were 85 at 2?years. In all patients, the 2?year OS, progression?free survival ( PFS) , and LC rates were 27?7%, 17?5%, and 38?9%, respectively. The hypo?fractionation group had similar prognosis to the conventional fractionation group. There were no significant differences in the 2?year OS, PFS, and LC rates between the two groups ( 35% vs. 26%, P=0?886;18% vs. 16%, P=0?560;67% vs. 36%, P=0?159) . There was also no significant difference in the 2?year OS rate between patients treated with and without PCI (44% vs. 18%, P=0?044). In 84 patients with treatment failure, 11 had local recurrence, 41 had distant metastasis, and 32 had local recurrence plus distant metastasis. Conclusions The hypofractionated radiotherapy has similar efficacy but substantially shortened radiation time compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. The palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy requires further study for ES?SCLC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)in patients with medically inoperable stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods SBRT was applied to 30 patients, including clinically staged T1 ,T2(≤5cm)or T3(chest wall primary tumors only), N0, M0 ,biopsy-confirmed NSCLC. All patients were precluded from lobotomy because of physical condition or comorbidity. No patients developed tumors of any T-stage in the proximal zone. SBRT was performed with the total dose of 50 Gy to 70 Gy in 10 - 11 fractions during 12 - 15 days. prescription line was set onthe edge of the PTV. Results The follow-up rate was 100%. The number of patients who completed the 1-, and 2-year follow-up were 15, and 10, respectively. All 30 patients completed therapy as planned. The complete response(CR), partial response(PR)and stable disease(SD)rates were 37%, 53% and 3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 16 months(range,4-36 months), Kaplan-Meier local control at 2 years was 94%. The 2-year overall survival was 84% and the 2-year cancer specific survival was 90%. Seven patients(23%)developed Grade 2 pneumonitis, no grade ＞ 2 acute or late lung toxicity was observed. No one developed chest wall pain. Conclusions It is feasible to deliver 50 Gy to 70 Gy of SBRT in 10 - 11 fractions for medically inoperable patients with stage Ⅰ / Ⅱ NSCLC. It was associated with low incidence of toxicities and provided sustained local tumor control.The preliminary investigation indicated the cancer specific survival probability of SBRT was high. It is necessary to perform similar investigation in a larger number of patients with long-term follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC). Methods Between January 2003 and December 2006, 154 patients diagnosed with extensive stage small cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study.Prognostic factors such as gender, age, performance status, smoking history, weight loss, distant metastasis, the number of matastasis, brain metastasis, the cycle of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) for EDSCLC patients were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results The median following-up time was 40. 5 months. The rate of follow-up was 92. 2%. The MST and overall survival rates at 3-year in smoking group and no-smoking group were 13 months, 11.8% and 17 months,22. 8%,respectively (χ2=3.40,P =0. 064);in ChT/TRT group and ChT group, they were 17. 2 months, 17.9%and 9.3 months,13.9%, respectively(χ2=10.47,P=0.001);and in the cycle of chemotherapy ≥4 group and ＜ 4 group, they were 16 months, 20. 1% and 9.3 months, 2. 9%, respectively (χ2=17.79,P=0. 000). By multivariate analysis, smoking history was a statistically significant unfavorable factor for OS in EDSCLC patients (versus no-smoking, hazard ratio (HR)=1.462, χ2=4.40, P=0.036). In addition, ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy and TRT were favorable prognostic factors ( ≥4 cycles vs ＜4 cycles, HR =0. 420,χ2 = 17. 17, P = 0. 000; ChT/TRT vs ChT, HR = 0. 634, χ2 = 6. 20, P = 0. 013). Conclusions Smoking is a independent unfavorable prognostic factor and ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy And TRT are independent favorable prognostic factors for OS in EDSCLC.